Victoriacross.ca

History

Narrative and evidence: the cases of Waterman and Hickey, the voice of Padre Wilmot, and the story of the Canadian Victoria Cross.

Colonel Ronald Waterman

Colonel Ronald Waterman

Leadership, valour, and the case for recognition.

Biography

Ronald Waterman began his service long before the first shot was fired in Italy. A professional soldier who rose from the ranks, he led men through Sicily, Ortona, and into the grinding advance toward the Gothic Line. He was not ornamental. He was direct, demanding, and present where the fighting was worst.

At the Foglia River in September 1944, Waterman rallied exhausted troops under intense machine gun and mortar fire. With communications broken and positions collapsing, he moved forward repeatedly under fire to reorganize his companies, drag wounded men to cover, and restore order where retreat seemed imminent. His leadership prevented a total collapse of the line.

A recommendation was written for the highest award for gallantry. It did not proceed. Instead, the record settled for lesser recognition. Waterman would later be relieved for exhaustion. Official language called it necessary. Those who served under him called it the cost of carrying too much for too long.

Timeline

  • 1943

    Sicily

    Waterman leads his men through the campaign.

  • 1943–1944

    Ortona

    Intense fighting; leadership under fire noted.

  • 1944

    Advance toward the Gothic Line

    Grinding advance through Italian theatre.

  • September 1944

    Foglia River

    Rallied troops under fire; recommendation for highest gallantry written.

  • Afterward

    Recognition and relief

    Lesser recognition only; later relieved for exhaustion.

Corporal Alphonsus Hickey

Corporal Alphonsus Hickey

The Gothic Line, action, and recommendation history.

Biography

Corporal Alphonsus Hickey was a steelworker from Cape Breton who served with the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry. He was not an officer. He was not decorated with high rank. His act of courage was simple and absolute.

During a withdrawal under heavy enemy fire near the Gothic Line, Hickey volunteered to remain behind with his Bren gun to cover his battalion's retreat. From a low stone wall, he fired in deliberate bursts, holding back advancing forces while wounded men crawled to safety. By dawn, his ammunition was spent. He had held the line alone.

His action saved lives. It was recorded briefly. He received a Mention in Despatches. No higher award followed.

Padre Laurence Wilmot, MC

Padre Laurence Wilmot, MC

The chaplain whose diary gives the book its name.

Biography

Padre Laurence Wilmot served as a chaplain with Canadian forces in Italy. He did not carry a rifle. He carried stretchers, prayers, and the burden of the dying.

At Ortona and later at the Foglia River, Wilmot moved through shellfire to recover wounded men from exposed ground. For his actions under fire, he was awarded the Military Cross. He rarely spoke of it.

His private diaries record the moral strain of command decisions, the exhaustion of officers, and the courage of ordinary soldiers. Through his words, the battlefield is seen not only in tactics and objectives, but in conscience and consequence. His account forms the moral spine of The Chaplain's Diary.

The Canadian Victoria Cross

Creation, criteria, and the fact that it remains unawarded.

In 1993, Canada created its own Victoria Cross as part of the Canadian honours system. The design mirrors the original British decoration, but carries the inscription Pro Valore. The standard remains unchanged. It is awarded for the most conspicuous bravery, or some daring or pre-eminent act of valour in the presence of the enemy.

Since its creation, the Canadian Victoria Cross has never been awarded.

Other Commonwealth nations, including Australia and New Zealand, have awarded their modern versions. Britain has reviewed and, in some cases, reassessed earlier conflicts. Canada's Cross remains uninscribed.

The Chaplain's Diary does not argue that standards should be lowered. It asks whether certain acts, recorded in diaries and operational reports, were seen clearly at the time. It invites readers to examine the historical record and decide whether silence was caution, policy, or something more enduring.